The cryptocurrency market has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past decade, evolving from a niche sector into one attracting substantial institutional interest.
Historically, the so-called “widowmaker” trade exemplified this shift. Traders capitalized on a premium in Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust, drawing billions of dollars into the market. However, the trade eventually faltered, highlighting the pressing need for robust market infrastructure and exposing the fact that institutional players often had to overpay for crypto exposure before Bitcoin ETFs became available.
This week, a similar pattern emerged with the Japan carry trade, which, like the widowmaker trade, demonstrated how crowded trades can create significant market impacts when they unravel. Arbitragers rushing to exit positions risk becoming trapped in losing trades.
In a recent discussion, Scott Melker, host of The Wolf of All Streets podcast, and John Divine, head of OTC trading at BlockFills, explored the evolution of the Bitcoin and crypto markets since the decline of the widowmaker trade. Their conversation highlighted how the market’s maturation has drawn institutional interest.
Divine provided an insightful historical overview, tracing the market’s development from the introduction of the Bitcoin protocol in 2009. He described the shift from peer-to-peer transactions to the rise of centralized exchanges like Kraken and Coinbase, which enabled the use of Bitcoin as collateral and led to the development of forward markets, perpetual swaps, and futures contracts.
He explained the “cash and carry trade,” a strategy involving buying spot Bitcoin and selling it forward in a contango market structure. While historically this trade yielded annualized returns of 25-30%, it now offers around 10% annualized returns but remains attractive to institutional investors familiar with similar strategies in traditional markets like gold and oil.
The discussion also covered recent developments such as the approval of Ethereum ETFs and the anticipated introduction of Bitcoin ETF options. Divine expressed surprise at the quicker approval of Ethereum ETF options compared to Bitcoin, noting that such options could mitigate Bitcoin’s volatility and enhance its appeal to institutional investors.
Melker and Divine discussed the broader implications of increased institutional involvement in Bitcoin. Melker observed that institutional participation could reduce market volatility, as evidenced by decreased drawdowns in recent cycles. Divine emphasized that greater institutional engagement would promote Bitcoin’s role as a decentralized and sound alternative to fiat currencies.
Related Topics:
